Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Jöhnk, Kerstin | Kuhtz-Buschbeck, Johann P. | Stolze, Henning | Serocki, Götz | Kalwa, Sabine | Ritz, Annegret | Benz, Barbara | Illert, Michael
Affiliations: Department of Physiology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany | Neurological Rehabilitation Centre Friedehorst, Bremen, Germany
Note: [] Correspondence to: Dr. Kerstin Jöhnk, Physiologisches Institut, Christian-Albrechts- Universität Kiel, Olshausenstrasse 40, D-24098 Kiel, Germany; Phone.: +49-431-8803204; Fax: +49-431-8804580; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Various basic qualitative and quantitative methods for the evaluation of sensorimotor functions after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) are introduced and discussed. Methodological aspects are illustrated by a single case follow-up study of a child after severe TBI (age 11; 712;1 yrs; 6, 8 and 12 month post TBI) in comparison to an age-matched healthy control group (N=16). The evaluation consisted of neurological investigation, Barthel-Index, Terver Numeric Score for Functional Assessment, Rappaport Disability Rating Scale (modified version), a coordination-test for children (KTK), a pilot-tested Motor Function Score, quantitative evaluation of spatiotemporal gait parameters on a walkway and on a treadmill, and the kinematic assessment of hand motor functions. Quantitative movement analyses revealed two general types of motor disorder: Slowing of movements and compensatory motor strategies. Averaged z-scores showed deficits, which were pronounced in fine motor skills (hand movements: 1.86, gait: 1.3). During follow-up, a strong improvement rate during the first (-0.48 z-scores) and nearly no improvement rate (-0.03 z-scores) during the second time interval was seen. Clinical scores and developmental tests were not able to document the whole restitutional course, whereas motor tests with special emphasis on functional aspects and the quantitative movement assessment seemed to be suitable methods. We conclude that a sufficient evaluation of sensorimotor functions after TBI in childhood needs an increase in procedural uniformity on onehand and the combination of various qualitative and quantitative methods on the other hand. To connect both claims, further research is necessary.
Keywords: traumatic brain injury, sensorimotor functions, functional restitution, children
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 2-3, pp. 143-152, 1999
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]