Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Robot-Assisted Therapy: A Clinical Perspective
Guest editors: Hermano Igo Krebs
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Duret, Christophea; * | Hutin, Emilieb
Affiliations: [a] Centre de Rééducation Fonctionnelle Les Trois Soleils, Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Unité de Neurorééducation, Boissise-Le-Roi, France | [b] Laboratoire Analyse et Restauration du Mouvement, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Rééducation Neurolocomotrice, AP-HP, Créteil, France
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Dr Christophe Duret, CRF Les Trois Soleils, Neurorehabilitation unit, 19 rue du Château, 77310 Boissise-Le-Roi, France. Tel.: +33 1 64718082; Fax: +33 1 60657625; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Background:High intensity and early initiation of rehabilitation have been extensively demonstrated to enhance neural plasticity and motor recovery after stroke. However, the optimal duration of rehabilitation programs in order to have the highest impact on motor outcomes has not been established. Objectives:To evaluate motor outcomes in subacute stroke survivors with moderate to severe upper limb paresis over an extended period of rehabilitation consisting of usual care augmented with a large number of upper limb robot-assisted sessions (54 ± 13 sessions). Methods:Retrospective study in 10 inpatients. Results:The results showed a gradual decrease in motor and functional impairments throughout the training period with a clinically meaningful increase in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores and in the Motor Status Scores (1st vs 37th day of the training, FMA,+ 48%, p = 0.018, MSS,+ 64%, p = 0.012; 37th vs. 79th day, FMA,+ 23%, p = 0.012, MSS,+ 30%, p = 0.017). In addition, there were improvements in hand kinematics recorded by the robot during a pointing task, with quantitative improvement (1st vs 40th day, movement efficacy,+ 97%, p = 0.0499; hand velocity,+ 335%, p = 0.013) prior to qualitative improvement (1st vs 80th day, number of hand trajectory reversals, −50%, p = 0.028; root mean square error of the trajectory/linear displacement, −52%, p = 0.059). Conclusions:Although this study was a retrospective analysis of a small sample of patients, the results suggested that a prolonged period of intensive upper limb rehabilitation, including robot-assisted training incorporated into a multidisciplinary program throughout the subacute phase after stroke resulted in significant improvements in patients with moderate to severe motor impairments.
Keywords: Hemiparesis, upper limb, subacute stroke, prolonged robot-assisted training
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-130926
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 41-48, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]