Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Review Article
Authors: McHugh, Conora; 1 | Taylor, Clarea; 1 | Mockler, Davidb; 2 | Fleming, Neila; 2; *
Affiliations: [a] Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland | [b] John Stearne Medical Library, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, School of Medicine, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Neil Fleming, E-mail: [email protected].
Note: [1] Denotes graduate student author.
Note: [2] Denotes professional author.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Epidural spinal cord stimulation (ESCS) emerged as a technology for eliciting motor function in the 1990’s and was subsequently employed therapeutically in the population with spinal cord injury (SCI). Despite a considerable number of ESCS studies, a comprehensive systematic review of ESCS remains unpublished. OBJECTIVE:The current review of the existing literature evaluated the efficacy of ESCS for improving motor function in individuals with SCI. METHODS:A search for ESCS studies was performed using the following databases: Medline (Ovid), Web of Science and Embase. Furthermore, to maximize results, an inverse manual search of references cited by identified articles was also performed. Studies published between January 1995 and June 2020 were included. The search was constructed around the following key terms: Spinal cord stimulation, SCI and motor response generation. RESULTS:A total of 3435 articles were initially screened, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria. The total sample comprised of 24 participants with SCI. All studies reported some measure of improvement in motor activity with ESCS, with 17 reporting altered EMG responses. Functional improvements were reported in stepping (n = 11) or muscle force (n = 4). Only 5 studies assessed ASIA scale pre- and post-intervention, documenting improved classification in 4 of 11 participants. Appraisal using the modified Downs and Black quality checklist determined that reviewed studies were of poor quality. Due to heterogeneity of outcome measures utilized in studies reviewed, a meta-analysis of data was not possible. CONCLUSION:While the basic science is encouraging, the therapeutic efficacy of ESCS remains inconclusive.
Keywords: Spinal cord stimulation, spinal cord injury and motor response generation
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-210093
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1-22, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]