Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Connors, Karola; * | Mahony, Lisaa | Morgan, Prueb
Affiliations: [a] Calvary Health Care Bethlehem, Melbourne, Australia | [b] Physiotherapy Department, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Karol Anne Connors, Calvary Health Care Bethlehem, 476 Kooyong Rd, Caulfield, Melbourne, VIC 3162, Australia. Tel.: +61 3 9595 3441; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Assistive devices enhance independence and quality of life for people living with motor neuron disease (MND), but prescription can be challenging. OBJECTIVE:Improved prescription of assistive devices, through improved understanding of the relationship between clinical phenotypes, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale – Revised (ALSFRS-R) functional domain sub-scores and assistive technology required by people living with MND. METHODS:Prospective, observational consecutive-sample study of 269 patients with MND diagnosis. Main outcome measures: MND phenotype, ALSFRS-R scores and assistive technology devices in use. RESULTS:A statistically significant difference in total concurrent assistive technology item use was found between phenotypes (p = 0.001), with those with ALS Bulbar onset using the least. There was also a statistically significant difference in assistive technology usage in five of seven assistive technology categories across the clinical phenotypes, namely orthoses (p < 0.000), mobility devices (p < 0.000), transfer devices (p < 0.000), communication devices (p < 0.000), and activities of daily living devices (p = 0.016). Correlations between ALSFRS-R sub-score items and assistive technology count confirmed the utility of this outcome measure for equipment prescription. CONCLUSIONS:Clinicians need to consider MND phenotype and/or ALSFRS-R domain sub-score in clinical decision-making regarding assistive technology, as this will determine the pattern of disease and its progression, and hence assistive technology required.
Keywords: Assistive technology, motor neuron disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, MND, ALS, ALSFRS-R
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-182511
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 303-313, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]