Affiliations: [a]
Department of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
| [b]
Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
| [c]
BioCruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain
| [d] IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
Correspondence:
[*]
Address for correspondence: Juan Carlos Arango Lasprilla, Ph.D, Grupo de Psicología y Salud, BioCruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Plaza de Cruces s/n. 48903, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain. Tel.: +34 946006000/Ext. 7963; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To examine the prevalence of perceived ethical misconduct in clinical practice, teaching, and research in the field of neuropsychology in Spain. METHOD:Two hundred and fifteen self-identified mental health professionals who engage in neuropsychology practice in Spain completed an online survey from July to December of 2013. In the ethics section of the survey, participants were asked to identify if neuropsychologists they know who work in their country engaged in specific kinds of ethical misconduct. RESULTS:41% reported receiving formal training in professional ethics. The clinical findings are as follows. The highest rate of perceived misconduct was found in the area of professional training and expertise, with an average of 40.7%, followed by research/publications (25.6%), clinical care (23.9%), and professional relationships (8.8%). Specifically, regarding training, over half of respondents (56.7%) know professionals who claim themselves to be neuropsychologists, even though they lack proper training or expertise and 46.0% know professionals in the field who do not have adequate training for experience to be working in the field. Regarding research/publications, 41.9% of respondents know professionals who appear as authors on publications where they have not made a significant contribution. Regarding clinical care, over one third of respondents endorse knowing professionals who (1) provide results of neuropsychological evaluations in such a way that patients or other professionals are not likely to understand (37.2%) and (2) do not have the skills or training to work with patients who are culturally different from them (34.9%). CONCLUSIONS:Less than half of survey respondents reported receiving ethics training. It is possible that introducing more or improved ethics courses into pre-graduate and/or graduate school curriculums, and/or requiring continuing ethics education certification may reduce perceived ethical misconduct among neuropsychological professionals in Spain.
