Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Special Section: Journey of a Pioneer: Dr Stefan Hesse 1960-2016. Robotics, Reflections and What’s Next
Guest editors: Hermano Igo Krebs
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Duret, Christophea; b; * | Mazzoleni, Stefanoc; d
Affiliations: [a] Centre de Rééducation Fonctionnelle Les Trois Soleils, Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Unité de Neurorééducation, Boissise-Le-Roi, France | [b] Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien, Neurologie, Corbeil-Essonnes, France | [c] The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy | [d] Rehabilitation Bioengineering Laboratory, Volterra, Italy
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Christophe Duret, MD, CRF Les Trois Soleils Neurorehabilitation unit, 19 rue du Château, 77310 Boissise-Le-Roi, France. Tel.: +33 1 64718082; Fax: +33 1 60657625; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: During the last two decades, extensive interaction between clinicians and engineers has led to the development of systems that stimulate neural plasticity to optimize motor recovery after neurological lesions. This has resulted in the expansion of the field of robotics for rehabilitation. Studies in patients with stroke-related upper-limb paresis have shown that robotic rehabilitation can improve motor capacity. However, few other applications have been evaluated (e.g. tremor, peripheral nerve injuries or other neurological diseases). PURPOSE: This paper presents an overview of the current use of upper limb robotic systems for neurorehabilitation, and highlights the rationale behind their use for the assessment and treatment of common neurological disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation robots are little integrated in clinical practice, except after stroke. Although few studies have been carried out to evaluate their effectiveness, evidence from the neurosciences and indications from pilot studies suggests that upper limb robotic rehabilitation can be applied safely in various other neurological conditions. Rehabilitation robots provide an intensity, quality and dose of treatment that exceeds therapist-mediated rehabilitation. Moreover, the use of force fields, multi-sensory environments, feedback etc. renders such rehabilitation engaging and motivating. Future studies should evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation robots in neurological pathologies other than stroke.
Keywords: Hemiparesis, motor learning, multiple sclerosis, neglect, neurorehabilitation, Parkinson disease, robotics, spinal cord injury, stroke
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-171452
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 5-15, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]