Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: ICF and Neurorehabilitation
Guest editors: Christina Brogårdh and Jan Lexell
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Richardson, Jessicaa; * | Datta, Abhishekb | Dmochowski, Jacekc | Parra, Lucas C.c | Fridriksson, Juliusa
Affiliations: [a] Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA | [b] Soterix Medical, Inc., New York, NY, USA | [c] Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Jessica Richardson, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, Assistant Professor, Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. Tel.: +1 803 777 5049; Fax: +1 803 777 3081; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Background:Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances treatment outcomes post-stroke. Feasibility and tolerability of high-definition (HD) tDCS (a technique that increases current focality and intensity) for consecutive weekdays as an adjuvant to behavioral treatment in a clinical population has not been demonstrated. Objective:To determine HD-tDCS feasibility outcomes: 1) ability to implement study as designed, 2) acceptability of repeated HD-tDCS administration to patients, and 3) preliminary efficacy. Methods:Eight patients with chronic post-stroke aphasia participated in a randomized crossover trial with two arms: conventional sponge-based (CS) tDCS and HD-tDCS. Computerized anomia treatment was administered for five consecutive days during each treatment arm. Results:Individualized modeling/targeting procedures and an 8-channel HD-tDCS device were developed. CS-tDCS and HD-tDCS were comparable in terms of implementation, acceptability, and outcomes. Naming accuracy and response time improved for both stimulation conditions. Change in accuracy of trained items was numerically higher (but not statistically significant) for HD-tDCS compared to CS-tDCS for most patients. Conclusions:Regarding feasibility, HD-tDCS treatment studies can be implemented when designed similarly to documented CS-tDCS studies. HD-tDCS is likely to be acceptable to patients and clinicians. Preliminary efficacy data suggest that HD-tDCS effects, using only 4 electrodes, are at least comparable to CS-tDCS.
Keywords: Aphasia, feasibility, high-definition tDCS, stroke, tDCS, treatment outcomes
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-141199
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 115-126, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]