Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: ICF and Neurorehabilitation
Guest editors: Christina Brogårdh and Jan Lexell
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Bonnyaud, Célinea; c; * | Pradon, Didiera | Zory, Raphaela | Bensmail, Djamelb | Vuillerme, Nicolasc; d | Roche, Nicolasa
Affiliations: [a] Université Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, APHP Service de physiologie et d'exploration fonctionnelle, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France | [b] Université Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, APHP Service de médecine physique et réadaptation, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France | [c] Laboratoire AGIM, FRE 3405 CNRS/UJF Grenoble/UPMF/EPHE, La Tronche, France | [d] Institut Universitaire de France, Boulevard Saint-Michel, Paris, France
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Céline Bonnyaud, Laboratoire d'analyse du mouvement EA 4497, CIC-IT 805, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104 Bld Raymond Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France. Tel.: +33 1 47 10 79 00; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Background:The Timed Up and Go (TUG) is a test of functional mobility which is routinely used in the assessment of hemiparetic patients. This easy and rapid to perform test includes motor tasks which occur frequently in daily life (stand up, walk, turn, sit down). Correlations between TUG performance and kinematic and kinetic gait parameters have never been studied. Objective:The aim of this study was to determine whether kinematic and kinetic gait parameters would be more related to TUG performance than spatio-temporal parameters in stroke patients. Methods:Sixty hemiparetic patients able to walk alone performed the TUG test and underwent 3D gait analysis and a clinical evaluation. A stepwise regression analysis was used to select the gait variables that best explained the variability in TUG performance. Results:The percentage of the gait cycle spent in single support phase on the paretic limb was the factor which was the most predictive and correlated with TUG performance, explaining 67% of the variance. No kinematic or kinetic gait parameters explained TUG performance. The results also suggested that TUG performance is mainly related to paretic lower limb motor function. Conclusions:TUG performance in hemiparetic patients mainly depends on the motor ability of the paretic lower limb, particularly the single support phase on the paretic side. Kinematic and kinetic gait parameters do not predict the TUG performance in stroke patients.
Keywords: Timed Up and Go test, hemiparesis, gait analysis, predictive factors, gait parameters
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-141194
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 73-80, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]