Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Case Report
Authors: Wallace, Sarah E.a; * | Purdy, Maryb | Skidmore, Elizabethc
Affiliations: [a] Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA | [b] Communication Disorders Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT, USA | [c] Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Sarah E. Wallace, 600 Forbes Ave, 410 Fisher Hall, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA. Tel.: +1 412 396 4219; Fax: +1 412 396 4196; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Background:Communication is essential for successful rehabilitation, yet few aphasia treatments have been investigated during the acute stroke phase. Alternative modality use including gesturing, writing, or drawing has been shown to increase communicative effectiveness in people with chronic aphasia. Instruction in alternative modality use during acute stroke may increase patient communication and participation, therefore resulting in fewer adverse situations and improved rehabilitation outcomes. Objective:The study purpose was to explore a multimodal communication program for aphasia (MCPA) implemented during acute stroke rehabilitation. MCPA aims to improve communication modality production, and to facilitate switching among modalities to resolve communication breakdowns. Methods:Two adults with severe aphasia completed MCPA beginning at 2 and 3 weeks post onset a single left-hemisphere stroke. Probes completed during each session allowed for evaluation of modality production and modality switching accuracy. Results:Participants completed MCPA (10 and 14 treatment sessions respectively) and their performance on probes suggested increased accuracy in the production of various alternate communication modalities. However, increased switching to an alternate modality was noted for only one participant. Conclusions:Further investigation of multimodal treatment during inpatient rehabilitation is warranted. In particular, comparisons between multimodal and standard treatments would help determine appropriate interventions for this setting.
Keywords: Aphasia, acute rehabilitation, multimodal treatment, stroke
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-141136
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 615-625, 2014
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]