Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Orthotics in Neurorehabilitation
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Morris, Christophera; b; * | Bowers, Royc | Ross, Karync | Stevens, Phild | Phillips, Davide
Affiliations: [a] Cerebra Research Unit and PenCLAHRC, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK | [b] Honorary Principal Orthotist, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK | [c] National Centre for Prosthetics and Orthotics, University of Strathclyde, UK | [d] Hanger Prosthetics and Orthotics Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, USA | [e] Orthotic Innovations, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Australia
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Chris Morris, Cerebra Research Unit and PenCLARHC, Child Health Group, Veysey Building, Salmon Pool Lane, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon EX2 4SG, UK. Tel.: +44 1392 262980; Fax: +44 1392 262964; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: An international multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals and researchers participated in a consensus conference on the management of cerebral palsy, convened by the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics. Participants reviewed the evidence and considered contemporary thinking on a range of treatment options including physical and occupational therapy, and medical, surgical and orthotic interventions. The quality of many of the reviewed papers was compromised by inadequate reporting and lack of transparency, in particular regarding the types of patients and the design of the interventions being evaluated. Substantial evidence suggests that ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) that control the foot and ankle in stance and swing phases can improve gait efficiency in ambulant children (GMFCS levels I-III). By contrast, little high quality evidence exists to support the use of orthoses for the hip, spine or upper limb. Where the evidence for orthosis use was not compelling consensus was reached on recommendations for orthotic intervention. Subsequent group discussions identified recommendations for future research. The evidence to support using orthoses is generally limited by the brevity of follow-up periods in research studies; hence the extent to which orthoses may prevent deformities developing over time remains unclear. The full report of the conference can be accessed free of charge at www.ispoint.org.
Keywords: Cerebral palsy, orthoses, orthotic, evidence-based, consensus
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0630
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 37-46, 2011
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]