Affiliations: [a] Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques, Department of Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada | [b] Aerospace Medical Research Unit, Department of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Note: [*] Reprint address: L.J.G. Bouyer, Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques, Department of Physiology, Université de Montreal. Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Acute, reversible changes in human vestibular function can be produced by exposure to “Torso Rotation” (TR), a method involving the overuse of certain types of simple, self-generated movements. A single session results in multiple, short-lasting aftereffects, including perceptual illusions, VOR gain reduction,gaze and postural instability, and motion sickness. With repeated exposure, motion sickness susceptibility disappears and gaze stability improves. VOR gain continues to be reduced, however. Therefore, another gaze stabilizing system must come into play. Are visual and/or neck inputs involved in this functional compensation? Six subjects participated in this 7-day experiment. Eye and head movements were measured during 2 tests: 1) voluntary “head only” shaking between 0.3 and 3.0 Hz (lights off) and 2) voluntary “head and torso” shaking, moving the upper body en bloc (neck immobilized). Measurements were obtained before and repeatedly after TR. Velocity gain (eye velocity/head velocity) was determined for each of these tests. Each day, mean velocity gain during “head only” shaking in the dark (averaged over 1.0 to 2.0 Hz) dropped significantly after TR (P<0.01), with no long-term improvement (P>0.9). Similar results, although more noisy, were obtained for “head and torso” shaking. As a control, EOG calibration data confirmed that gaze stability in the light did improve over the 7 days of testing. This experiment demonstrates that the reduction in gaze instability following repeated exposure to TR results from an increased use of vision. It excludes the VOR, the COR, and predictive mechanisms (including efference copy) as contributors. In addition, in the 20 minutes following TR completion, gaze stability recovered less than during previous VOR testing in the dark. These results are compatible with the motion that exposure to TR leads to a change in sensorimotor strategy involving a de-emphasis of vestibular inputs.
