Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Healy, Nicolea
Affiliations: [a] Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Clogherane East, Lauragh, Killarney, Co. Kerry
Abstract: The aims of the present study were (a) to investigate production of the spatial locatives ‘in front of’ and ‘behind’, using fronted objects (those with a distinct front and back), with a view to discovering in which order they typically emerge; and (b) to ascertain whether there is a difference between the emergence of production of these locatives when the referent is the child’s own body and when it is another fronted object. Eighteen typically developing children between the ages of 2;0 and 4;11 years were recruited at 3 childcare centres in the Cork City area. The participants were included in 3 age groups, with 6 in each group. Participants were tested individually at the childcare centres. Each participant underwent two locative elicitation procedures. The first procedure was designed to elicit the target locatives, using the child’s own body as the object of reference, while the second procedure involved the use of another fronted object (a teddy bear) as the referent. The results indicated that there was a significant difference between performances on the locatives ‘in front of’ and ‘behind’, with performance on ‘in front of’ being poorer. There was no significant difference between performances on these locatives when the object of reference was the participant’s own body, and when it was another fronted object. The first conclusion of the present study was that production of the locative ‘behind’, using fronted objects, appears to be acquired before ‘in front of’. Secondly, it would appear that acquisition of both locatives, when the object of reference is the child’s own body, occurs at approximately the same time as when the referent is another fronted object. These findings have possible clinical implications. Firstly, the results would suggest that, when targeting locatives, production of ‘behind’ should be facilitated prior to ‘in front of’. Also, it might be concluded that one may begin to facilitate production of these locatives using either the child’s own body or another fronted object as the referent. Future research might aim to investigate the acquisition of intrinsic ‘behind’ and ‘in front of’ with regard to comprehension.
DOI: 10.3233/ACS-2009-17110
Journal: Journal of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 133-153, 2009
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]