Affiliations: [a] Department of Rehabilitation, Juarez Autonomous University of Tabasco, Villahermosa, Mexico | [b] Team of Formation and Research in Pain (EFID in Spanish), National University of Rosario, Rosario, Argentina | [c] Division of Health Sciences, Juarez Autonomous University of Tabasco, Villahermosa, Mexico | [d] Advanced Center of Sports Medicine, Autonomous University of Yucatan, Mérida, Mexico
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Rosa Giannina Castillo-Avila, Academic Division of Health Sciences, Juarez Autonomous University of Tabasco, Av. Gregorio Méndez Magaña, No. 2838-A. Col. Tamulté, C.P. 86100, Villahermosa, Tabasco, Mexico. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid injections are frequently used in the short-term treatment of musculoskeletal pain, but their use is controversial as repeated exposures to corticosteroids can lead to deleterious effects on musculoskeletal tissue. Ozone injections have been proposed as a possible treatment for musculoskeletal pain; however, their effectiveness has not been compared with corticosteroids. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of ozone injections for reducing pain in individuals with musculoskeletal pain in comparison with corticosteroid injections through a meta-analysis. METHODS:An online systematic search was performed using electronic databases up to September 2023. We searched for studies that compared corticosteroid injections with ozone injections in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain of diverse origins. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included comprising a total of 534 individuals. In the overall pooled analysis, a pain reduction in favor of corticosteroid injections was found in the short term (d= 0.31, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.60, p (z) 0.04, I2 = 32%). In the medium term, no significant differences were found in reducing pain between groups (d=-0.17, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.07, p (z) 0.15, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that corticosteroids injections are more effective in reducing musculoskeletal pain in the short term, but equally effective in the medium term when compared with ozone injections. Nonetheless, better-quality clinical trials are necessary to corroborate these results.
