Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Ceballos-Laita, Luisa; * | Pérez-Manzano, Albertoa | Mingo-Gómez, Teresaa | Hernando-Garijo, Ignacioa | Medrano-De-La-Fuente, Ricardoa | Estébanez-de-Miguel, Elenab | Jiménez-del-Barrio, Sandraa
Affiliations: [a] Department Surgery, Ophtalmology, Otorrinolaringology and Physiotherapy, University of Valladolid, Soria, Spain | [b] Department Physiatry and Nursery, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Luis Ceballos-Laita, Department Surgery, Ophtalmology, Otorrinolaringology and Physiotherapy, University of Valladolid, c/Universidad s/n, Soria 42004, Spain. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The detection of primary risk factors through the assessment of shoulder range of motion (ROM) and muscle function could prevent injuries in the initial stages of the handball (HB) practice. OBJECTIVE: To compare shoulder ROM, muscle strength and muscle extensibility between throwing and non-throwing shoulders in young HB athletes and between non-HB athletes. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed. Participants aged between 14–16 years that practice physical activity regularly were included and divided in two groups. The HB group included volunteers who practiced HB, the control group included volunteers who practiced other activities. The variables measured were internal rotation and external rotation ROM, maximum isometric strength, and extensibility of the tissues of the posterior part of the throwing and non-throwing shoulder. RESULTS: Thirty-seven subjects were included. The HB group (n= 19) showed greater ROM in both shoulders compared to the control group (n= 18) (p< 0.05). The throwing shoulder of the HB group showed less internal rotation ROM, greater external rotation ROM and greater internal rotation strength when compared to the non-throwing shoulder (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest that young HB athletes present differences in shoulder ROM compared to non-HB athletes. Also, HB athletes showed differences in ROM and strength between the TS and non-TS. Hence, the assessment of the shoulder ROM and muscle function should be taken into consideration to avoid injuries in this population.
Keywords: Shoulder joint, range of motion, rotator cuff, children
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-200304
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 161-167, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]