Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Hauswirth, Jürga; b; c | Ernst, Markus J.b; * | Preusser, Marianne Lanzb; d | Meichtry, Andréb | Kool, Janb; e | Crawford, Rebecca J.f; g
Affiliations: [a] Cantonal Hospital of Baselland/Bruderholz, CH-4201 Bruderholz, Switzerland | [b] Department of Health, Institute of Physiotherapy, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland | [c] International Maitland Teachers Association (IMTA), Zurzach, Switzerland | [d] Schaffhausen Cantonal Hospital, Geissbergstrasse 81, CH-8208 Schaffhausen, Switzerland | [e] Rehabilitation Centre Kliniken Valens, CH-7317 Valens, Switzerland | [f] Department of Health, Institute of Health Sciences, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland | [g] Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Markus J. Ernst, Department of Health, Institute of Physiotherapy, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Technikumstr. 71, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland. Tel.: +49 58 934 6448; Fax: +49 58 935 6448; E-mail:[email protected]
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Lateral gliding cervical spine mobilisation is shown to improve shoulder pain, disability and function. However, despite common clinical-use, no study reports the effect of unilateral anterior-posterior (A-P) cervical mobilisation on shoulder pain and function, and particularly in patients after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. OBJECTIVE: Examine the immediate effect of single-level Grade III cervical unilateral A-P mobilisation on shoulder pain, flexion and abduction range of motion (ROM) and external rotator strength compared to placebo cervical unilateral A-P light touch pressure. METHODS: Single session intervention with a crossover design in 32 (15 women) postoperative arthroscopic shoulder patients. RESULTS: Immediate and superior treatment effects were shown for A-P cervical mobilisation in improving flexion ROM, isometric strength of external rotation, and pain intensity during flexion (all p< 0.05) when compared to the placebo. However, effects may not be considered clinically meaningful. CONCLUSION: Unilateral A-P mobilisation applied to the cervical spine shows a tendency toward positively influencing post-arthroscopy shoulder pain and function. Further study examining cervical mobilisations directed in different planes to influence shoulder motion appear warranted.
Keywords: Shoulder arthroscopy, cervical spine mobilisation, pain, range of motion, isometric strength
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-160566
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 615-623, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]