Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Feature Section: The PM&R Awareness Initiative
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Fiebert, I.M.*; | Roach, K.E. | Fromdahl, J.W. | Moyer, J.D. | Pfeiffer, F.F.
Affiliations: Division of Physical Therapy, University of Miami School of Medicine, 5915 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Coral Gables, Florida 33146, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. Tel.: + 1 305 2844535; fax: + 1 305 2846128; e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between hand size and grip strength at various handle positions using the Jamar handheld dynamometer in females. Eighty-eight female physical therapy students between the ages of 20 and 40 were recruited. Subjects were weighed and their height measured. Right hand size was determined by measuring from the distal tip of the third digit to the radiocarpal joint with a tape measure. Subjects were divided into two groups by hand size (<7.0 and ≥7.0 inches). The order of handle positions was randomly selected. Subjects were seated according to the American Society of Hand Therapists’ recommended testing position with shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, elbow flexed to 90° and forearm and wrist in neutral. Subjects maximally squeezed the handle of the dynamometer with the right hand for 3 s. This process was repeated three times at each handle position. A repeated measures ANOVA was performed comparing the change in average grip strength between position 2, 3 and 4 for small and large hands. The mean age of the two groups were similar (25.96 vs. 25.89, p=0.95). Subjects with smaller hands were shorter (61.7 vs. 65.5 inches, p=0.0001) and produced lower grip strengths than those with large hands at all positions (p=0.0084). Height and hand size were strongly correlated (r=0.74, p=0.0001) as were height and weight (r=0.66, p=0.0001) and weight and hand size (r=59, p=0.0001). Height was the most strongly correlated with grip strength at all positions followed by hand size then weight. Age was shown not to be significantly correlated with grip strength in this study. These findings suggest that handle position 2 and 3 produce similar grip strength measurements even in women with smaller hands. Position 4 is significantly worse than positions 2 and 3.
Keywords: Grip, Jamar dynamometer, Grip strength, Hand size
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-1998-10305
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 137-142, 1998
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]