Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: İnal, Esra E.a; * | Eser, Filizb | Aktekin, Lale A.b | Öksüz, Ergunc | Bodur, Haticeb
Affiliations: [a] Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Nafiz Körez Sincan State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey | [b] Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey | [c] Family Medicine Unit Medicosocial Help Center, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Esra Erkol İnal, Elvan Mahallesi 20.Cadde 1890 sokak Atılım Sitesi B Blok No:34/21, Etimesgut, Ankara, Turkey. Tel.: +90 312 3726240; Fax: +90 312 2735151; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Cervical and lumbar roots may be irritated or compressed due to the pathological conditions such as disc herniations, degenerative foraminal stenosis, trauma and tumors. Electrophysiologic tests are frequently used in conjunction with imaging modalities for evaluation of low back and neck pain radiating to extremities, primarily for the purpose of establishing the presence or absence of a radiculopathy. In this study, we aimed to evalulate the relationship between clinic and electroneuromyographic (ENMG) findings in patients with suspected radiculopathies. Forty one patients with radicular complaints in the upper extremities and 51 patients with radicular complaints in the lower extremities were included in this study. McNemar test and Kappa coefficients between the two methods were applied to each group of patients, in order to test the significance of the difference between the two diagnostic procedures’ ability on finding out the pathology. The McNemar test identified a significant difference between the two diagnostic approaches both for cervical and lumbar radiculopathies (p<0.001). The Kappa coefficients between the two methods were determined as 0.08 and 0.07, respectively. This means, efficacy of anamnesis and neurological examination for the prediction of electrodiagnostic tests was found to be limited. Normal neurological examination results in a patient with suspected radiculopathy can not eliminate abnormal electrodiagnostic test results; likewise, abnormal findings in the neurological examination would not mean finding pathologies in the electrodiagnostic tests. For more accurate approach to a patient, neurological examination and electrodiagnostic tests must be used and interpreted together.
Keywords: Electromyography, radiculopathy, radicular symptoms
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-2012-00364
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 169-173, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]