Experimental analysis of the influence of stenotic geometry on steady flow

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Liepsch, Dieter^a | Singh, Megha^a | Lee, Martin^b

Affiliations: [a] Fachhochschule München, Lothstrasse 34, D-8000 München 2, Germany | [b] Department of Medical Physiology, University of Calgary, Canada

Abstract: We studied the flow behavior under steady flow conditions in four models of cylindrical stenoses at Reynolds numbers from 150 to 920. The flow upstream of the constrictions was always fully developed. The constriction ratios of the rigid tubes (D) to the stenoses (d) were d/D = 0.273; 0.505; 0.548; 0.786. The pressure drop at various locations in the stenotic models was measured with water manometers. The flow was visualized with a photoelasticity apparatus using an aqueous birefringent solution. We also studied the flow behavior at pulsatile flow in a dog aorta with a constriction of 71%. The flow through stenotic geometries depends on the Reynolds number of the flow generated in the tube and the constriction ratio d/D. At low d/D ratios, (with the increased constriction), the flow separation zones (recirculation zones, so-called reattachment length) and flow disturbances increased with larger Reynolds numbers. At lower values, eddies were generated. At high Re, eddies were observed in the pre-stenotic regions. The pressure drop is a function of the length and internal diameter of the stenosis, respective ratio of stenosis to the main vessel and the Reynolds numbers. At low Re-numbers and low d/D, distinct recirculation zones were found close to the stenosis. The flow is laminar in the distal areas. Further experiments under steady and unsteady flow conditions in a dog aorta model with a constriction of 71% showed similar effects. High velocity fluctuations downstream of the stenosis were found in the dog aorta. A videotape demonstrates these results.

Keywords: Flow visualization, stenoses, arterial model, birefringent solution, constriction

DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1992-29405

Journal: Biorheology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 419-431, 1992