Numerical simulation of sinusoidal flow in a straight elastic tube: Effects of phase angles

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Dutta, A. | Tarbell, J.M.

Affiliations: Department of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 104 Fenske Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.

Note: [] Accepted by: Editor D. Liepsch

Abstract: Numerical simulations of flow in straight elastic (moving wall) tubes subjected to a sinusoidal pressure gradient were performed for conditions prevailing in large and medium sized arteries. The effects of varying the phase angle between the pressure gradient and the tube radius, the amplitude of wall motion, and the unsteadiness parameter (α) on flow rate and wall shear stress were investigated. Mean and peak flow rates and shear stresses were found to be strongly affected by the phase angle between the pressure gradient and the tube radius with greater sensitivity at higher diameter variation and higher α. In large artery simulations (α = 12), mean flow rate was found to be 60% higher and peak flow rate to be 73% higher than corresponding rigid tube values for certain phase angles, while a threefold increase in mean wall shear stress and sevenfold increase in peak wall shear stress were observed in a sensitive phase angle range. Significant reversal in the wall shear stress direction occurred in the sensitive phase angle range even when there was negligible flow rate reversal. All effects were greatly diminished in simulations of medium sized vessels (α = 4). Some experimental evidence to support the predictions of a strong effect of phase angle on wall shear stress in large vessels is presented. Finally, physiological implications of the present work are discussed from a basis of aortic input impedance data, and a physical explanation for the extreme sensitivity of the flow field to small amplitude wall motion at high α is given.

Keywords: Wall shear stress, sinusoidal flow, elastic tube, phase angle, atherosclerosis, impedance

DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1989-26101

Journal: Biorheology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-22, 1989