Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: van Vugt, F.T.a; b | Kafczyk, T.a | Kuhn, W.a | Rollnik, J.D.c | Tillmann, B.b | Altenmüller, E.a; *
Affiliations: [a] Institute of Music Physiology and Musicians’ Medicine, University of Music, Drama and Media, Emmichplatz, Hannover, Germany | [b] Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Auditory Cognition and Psychoacoustics Team, CNRS-UMR 5292, INSERM U1028, University Lyon-1, 50 av Tony Garnier, Lyon, France | [c] Institute for Neurorehabilitational Research (InFo), BDH-Clinic Teaching Hospital of Hannover Medical School (MHH), Greitstrasse 18, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: E. Altenmüller, University of Music, Drama and Theater. Institute of Music Physiology and Musicians’ Medicine, Emmichplatz 1, 30175 Hannover, Germany. Tel.: +49 (0)511 3100 553; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Purpose: Learning to play musical instruments such as piano was previously shown to benefit post-stroke motor rehabilitation. Previous work hypothesised that the mechanism of this rehabilitation is that patients use auditory feedback to correct their movements and therefore show motor learning. We tested this hypothesis by manipulating the auditory feedback timing in a way that should disrupt such error-based learning. Methods: We contrasted a patient group undergoing music-supported therapy on a piano that emits sounds immediately (as in previous studies) with a group whose sounds are presented after a jittered delay. The delay was not noticeable to patients. Thirty-four patients in early stroke rehabilitation with moderate motor impairment and no previous musical background learned to play the piano using simple finger exercises and familiar children’s songs. Results: Rehabilitation outcome was not impaired in the jitter group relative to the normal group. Conversely, some clinical tests suggests the jitter group outperformed the normal group. Conclusions: Auditory feedback-based motor learning is not the beneficial mechanism of music-supported therapy. Immediate auditory feedback therapy may be suboptimal. Jittered delay may increase efficacy of the proposed therapy and allow patients to fully benefit from motivational factors of music training. Our study shows a novel way to test hypotheses concerning music training in a single-blinded way, which is an important improvement over existing unblinded tests of music interventions.
Keywords: Stroke rehabilitation, sensorimotor integration, music intervention, timing, auditory feedback, motor learning
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-150588
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 297-311, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]