Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Purchase individual online access for 1 year to this journal.
Price: EUR 250.00Authors: van Eijsden-Besseling, Marjon D.F. | van den Bergh, Karien A.M. | Staal, J. Bart | de Bie, Rob A. | Smeets, Rob J.E.M. | van den Heuvel, Wim J.A.
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Objective: To assess the influence of work- and treatment-related factors on clinical status and functional disability in patients with non-specific work-related upper limb disorders (WRULD). Participants: 182 computer workers with non-specific WRULD, 18–50 years old, not having specific WRULD nor incomplete medical records. Methods: Retrospective cohort study among computer workers with non-specific WRULD; average follow-up 4 years. Medical records at time of diagnosis and during treatment period and a follow-up questionnaire were used. …Setting: Outpatient department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht. Outcome measures: Non-specific WRULD (clinical status) and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) at follow-up. Results: 103 patients (57%) returned the questionnaire. Of these, 14% developed a chronic pain syndrome, 9% recovered, 77% worsened slightly. None of the selected work- and treatment-related factors were significantly associated with clinical status. "Number of working hours per week before diagnosis" was negatively (b=−0.66, p=0.00) and "other therapies during treatment" (b=8.76, p=0.02) positively associated with DASH. Conclusions: Computer workers with non-specific WRULD have a poor prognosis. Working more hours before diagnosis seems not predictive for disability while having undergone other therapies during treatment period does. Prospective cohort studies are recommended to unravel the associations found. Show more
Keywords: Non-specific work-related upper limb disorders (WRULD), work-related factors, treatment factors, prognosis, functional disability
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1096
Citation: Work, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 425-432, 2010
Authors: Taylor, Wendell C. | Shegog, Ross | Chen, Vincent | Rempel, David M. | Baun, MaryBeth Pappas | Bush, Cresendo L. | Green, Tomas | Hare-Everline, Nicole
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Objective: Work breaks are underutilized opportunities to promote health. The Booster Break program is a co-worker led physical activity group session devoted exclusively to standard 15-minute work breaks. The purpose of this study was to report the fidelity, attendance, feasibility, and sustainability of the Booster Break program and to explore its potential impact. Participants: The study site was a small business that provides legal and court reporting services to lawyers. The company's services include …legal videography, litigation, records retrieval, and videoconferencing to civil attorneys. Established in 1973, the organization has 14 employees (8 women and 6 men), from 32 to 66 years of age. Methods: For six months, this small business implemented the Booster Break program. Booster Break facilitators conducted the group sessions according to protocol, which included describing, cueing, and executing the physical activity sequence. Results: During the six month period, 117 sessions were conducted. The average monthly attendance ranged from 76% to 86%. Participants significantly improved HDL cholesterol (p=0.04) and lost an average of 14 pounds. Conclusions: The Booster Break program is a feasible physical activity program for small business settings. The implications of the Booster Break program for future research in worksite settings are discussed. Show more
Keywords: Worksites, health promotion, physical activity, work breaks, employee health
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1097
Citation: Work, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 433-443, 2010
Authors: McLoone, Hugh E. | Jacobson, Melissa | Hegg, Chau | Johnson, Peter W.
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Objective: Research has shown that fixed-split, ergonomic keyboards lessen the pain and functional status in symptomatic individuals as well as reduce the likelihood of developing musculoskeletal disorders in asymptomatic typists over extended use. The goal of this study was to evaluate design features to determine whether the current fixed-split ergonomic keyboard design could be improved. Participants: Thirty-nine, adult-aged, fixed-split ergonomic keyboard users were recruited to participate in one of three studies. Methods: First …utilizing non-functional models and later a functional prototype, three studies evaluated keyboard design features including: 1) keyboard lateral inclination, 2) wrist rest height, 3) keyboard slope, and 4) curved "gull-wing" key layouts. Results: The findings indicated that keyboard lateral inclination could be increased from 8° to 14°; wrist rest height could be increased up to 10 mm from current setting; positive, flat, and negative slope settings were equally preferred and facilitated greater postural variation; and participants preferred a new gull-wing key layout. The design changes reduced forearm pronation and wrist extension while not adversely affecting typing performance. Conclusions: This research demonstrated how iterative-evaluative, user-centered research methods can be utilized to improve a product's design such as a fixed-split ergonomic keyboard. Show more
Keywords: Computers, text entry, design process, wrist posture, forearm posture, performance
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1109
Citation: Work, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 445-456, 2010
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]