Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Purchase individual online access for 1 year to this journal.
Price: EUR 145.00Authors: Brock, Matthew E. | Cannella-Malone, Helen I. | Schaefer, John M. | Justin Page, E. | Andzik, Natalie R. | Seaman, Rachel L.
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: BACKGROUND: High-quality job coaching services are pivotal to the vocational success of adults with severe disabilities. However, many job coaches lack formal training in evidence-based instructional practices. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we test the efficacy of a training package on the degree to which six job coaches implement three evidence-based instructional practices with fidelity (i.e., task analysis, simultaneous prompting, and least-to-most prompting). METHOD: The training package features promising strategies that are validated in the broader staff training literature: description, modeling, and performance feedback on implementation steps. Six multiple baseline across behavior experiments were conducted. …RESULTS: All participants made progress toward correct implementation with group training, although some participants required individualized coaching to achieve correct implementation of all steps. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence that promising training strategies can be used to train job coaches to implement evidence-based instructional practices for adults with severe disabilities. In addition, this training provides one model for how to use both group and one-to-one coaching formats in tandem to promote implementation fidelity. Show more
Keywords: Staff training, job coaching, modeling, performance feedback, implementation science, severe disabilities
DOI: 10.3233/JVR-160835
Citation: Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 351-364, 2016
Authors: Li, Jian | Cichy, Kelly E. | Rumrill, Phillip D. | McMahon, Brian T.
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Little is known about the employment discrimination experiences of middle-aged workers with disabilities. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the employment discrimination experiences of middle-age charging parties with disabilities (ages 35–54 years) in comparison to younger adult charging parties with disabilities (ages 25–34 years) on demographic characteristics (e.g., gender, disability type), characteristics of employers against whom allegations were filed (e.g., size, industry type), the nature of the discrimination, and the resolution of these allegations. METHODS: The study utilized data from the Integrated Mission System of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). RESULTS: Findings …indicated that, compared to younger adult charging parties, middle-age charging parties were more likely to be male and Caucasian; more likely to file allegations on the basis of diabetes, heart/cardiovascular disease, back impairments, and cancer; and less likely to file allegations on the basis of anxiety disorders, manic depressive disorder, schizophrenia, or other psychological impairments. Middle-age charging parties were less likely than younger charging parties to allege discrimination related to unlawful discharge and constructive discharge, but more likely to allege discrimination related to layoff. They were less likely to allege discrimination against small employers and employers in the finance/insurance, accommodation/food service, and retail trade industries. Middle-age charging parties were more likely to allege discrimination against employers in the manufacturing, transportation and warehousing, utilities, educational services, and public administration industries. Middle-age charging parties were slightly less likely than younger adult charging parties to have ADA title I allegations resolved in their favor through the EEOC’s investigatory process. CONCLUSIONS: Implications for working with prime age workers with disabilities are discussed. Show more
Keywords: Workplace discrimination, middle-age workers with disabilities, younger adult workers with disabilities, equal employment opportunity commission
DOI: 10.3233/JVR-160836
Citation: Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 365-376, 2016
Article Type: Other
Citation: Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 377-379, 2016
Article Type: Other
Citation: Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 381-382, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]