Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: De Blasi, Géraldinea; b; * | Bouteyre, Evelyneb | Rollin, Laetitiaa; c
Affiliations: [a] Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (CCPPE), Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France | [b] Clinical Psychopathology, Language and Subjectivity Laboratory (LPCLS – EA 3278), Aix-Marseille University, Aix-en-Provence, France | [c] Biology and Health Information Processing Team (TIBS), Computer Science, Information Processing and Systems Laboratory (LITIS – EA 4108), Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Géraldine De Blasi, CHU de Rouen, CCPPE, Pavillon Aubette, 1 rue Germont, F-76031 Rouen Cedex, France. Tel.: +33 2 32 88 82 69; Fax: +33 2 32 88 04 04; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Enabling cancer survivors to resume employment has become a public health issue in France, but not all survivors wish to or would benefit from doing so. OBJECTIVE:This French exploratory qualitative study was designed to identify the psychological factors that influence the decision of some cancer survivors not to return to work, despite their doctor’s permission. METHODS:We conducted semi structured interviews with two women and one man. Each interview lasted around 90 minutes. Qualitative analysis of the interviews (clinical case studies) highlighted a number of similarities and differences among these three patients. RESULTS:Comparisons revealed six similarities: 1. the issue of income and its importance had no part in the decision-making process; 2. patients anticipated work return problems; 3. they therefore abandoned their plans to go back; 4. work lost its meaning for them; 5. repressed affects surfaced or they reassessed their career plans; and 6. their life trajectories were disrupted, with the stages being telescoped together. There were also two differences: 1. feelings of social exclusion for two participants, and 2. gendered experiences of quitting employment. CONCLUSIONS:Health professionals and job retention support services need to take this clinical reality into account and acknowledge that not all patients wish to resume work or would benefit from doing so.
Keywords: Cancer survivors, employment, decision-making process, case studies, return to work
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-182712
Journal: Work, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 105-115, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]