Affiliations: [a] School of Kinesiology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| [b] Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| [c] BTE Technology, Milton, ON, Canada
| [d] School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
Correspondence:
[*]
Address for correspondence: Steven Fischer, PhD, R.Kin, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W., Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1. Tel.: +1 519 888 4567 /Ext. 30368; Fax: +1 519 885 4070; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: In Canada, functional capacity evaluations (FCEs) are commonly administered by several health care professions including kinesiologists. Kinesiologists have been recently regulated as health care professionals in Ontario and we know little about their demographics, the frequency of FCE administration, or the types of FCEs used by this group. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to identify: 1) the demographic characteristics and FCE education of kinesiology FCE practitioners; 2) the FCE systems most used by these practitioners and 3) the constructs from assessments used to determine functional capacity. METHODS: A survey was distributed to members of the Canadian Kinesiology Alliance. Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions were calculated from the survey responses (n = 77). RESULTS: FCE practitioners were represented by kinesiologists (79%) practicing more than 15 years and 1–5 years, who received FCE training from a certification course. ARCON (23%) was the most common FCE system used. Low-level lifting (43%), mid-lift (38%), pulling (38%) and walking (38%) are the most common FCE task components used to assess functional capacity. Although kinesiologists consider multiple factors when making decisions about task component endpoints, biomechanical observations/body mechanics are the primary methods used. CONCLUSIONS: Kinesiologists are conducting FCEs for the primary purpose of preparing return-to-work or workplace accommodation recommendations. Although functional capacity is determined using multiple factors, there is an emphasis on biomechanics and body mechanics. Focusing FCE training and research on these constructs may provide opportunities to further strengthen the reliability and validity of FCE outcomes.
Keywords: Return-to-work, functional capacity assessments, kinesiology, allied health professionals, occupationalrehabilitation
