Affiliations: [a] Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, Logroño, Spain
| [b]
Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Rita Louzán, PhD, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, Logroño, Spain. E-mail:[email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:
Self-reported test is one of the main psychosocial risk assessment tools. However, this test it is susceptible to certain sources of error, including social desirability. Since psychosocial risks are emerging, there are not many studies on their assessment. OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this work is to analyze the impact of social desirability on the short version of the CopSoq-ISTAS 21 assessment tool. METHOD:
A total of 563 workers (45.10% women and 54.90% men) participated in this study. The short version of the CoPsoQ-Istas21 questionnaire with four Likert scale questions as markers, which correspond to the Eysenck Personality Lie Scale Questionnaire Revised (EPQ-r), were used. The sample was divided into two halves, and both a confirmatory analysis and an exploratory analysis were carried out to find out the factorial structure of the scale and, with it, apply the bias filtering method. RESULTS:
The results indicate that 10% of the scale is biased due to social desirability, and that there are significant differences between the group with bias clean scores and the group with scores without bias control. CONCLUSIONS:
The effects of social desirability on the scale are verified, so it is concluded that in a psychosocial risk assessment is not enough to apply a self-report test and interpret its results, being necessary to minimize the sources of error.
Keywords: Risk assessment methodologies, occupational risk, occupational stress, social desirability, bias, reproducibility of results
