Affiliations: [a] NUST Business School, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
| [b] Faculty of Business, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman
| [c] Department of Management Sciences, Lahore Garrison University, Lahore, Pakistan
| [d] Department of Management Sciences, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan
Correspondence:
[*]
Address for correspondence: Muhammad Zeeshan Mirza, NUST Business School, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Contemporary literature raises serious questions about the inclusion of negatively worded items in the safety climate scale. Despite these reservations, limited efforts have been made to address this shortcoming. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to adapt and empirically validate the ten-items group-level safety climate scale with the purpose of replacing negatively worded items with positively worded ones after a thorough validation process. The present study is one of the first to propose an empirically validated group-level safety climate scale that uses positive items to measure the safety climate construct. METHODS: Study 1 was conducted using a sample of 135 participants. Study 2 used a time-lagged approach to validate the scale, with a sample of 173 production workers from six oil and gas organizations in Malaysia. The Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) method was used to test the hypothesized relationships. RESULTS: In Study 1, the results of the exploratory factor analysis showed good reliability for the revised scale. In Study 2, the results of the PLS-SEM analysis demonstrated a positive relationship between safety climate and safety behaviors, thereby validating the revised and translated scale of safety climate. CONCLUSION: The revised safety climate scale will not only improve data quality, but it will also increase response rates. Additionally, the revised scale will assist managers in understanding the true perceptions of safety climate in their organization, regardless of the cultural context in which the scale is used.
Keywords: Safety, behavior rating scale, group behavior, occupational safety, oil and gas industry, safety management
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230150
Journal: Work, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 1005-1016, 2024
