Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Nogueira, Rosenkranz Maciela; b; c | Saint-Martin, Daniel Rodrigues Ferreiraa; b | Barreto, Kevin Alvesa; b | Von Koenig Soares, Edgard M. K.a; b | Smith, Denise L.d | Molina, Guilherme E.a; b | Porto, Luiz Guilherme Grossia; b; *
Affiliations: [a] Universidade de Brasılia, Faculdade de Educação Física, Brasılia, Brazil | [b] Universidade de Brasılia, Grupo de Estudos em Fisiologia e Epidemiologia do Exercício e da Atividade Física (GEAFS), Brasılia, Brazil | [c] Federal District Military Firefighter Brigade CBMDF, Brasilia, Brazil | [d] First Responder Health and Safety Laboratory, Department of Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Luiz Guilherme Grossi Porto, B.P.E., MSc., PhD., Universidade de Brasılia, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Brasılia, DF, 70910-900, Brazil. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Firefighting is a physically demanding profession. Firefighters (FFs) need adequate physical fitness (PF) to perform duty tasks efficiently. While FFs’ work demands are constant throughout their career, there is an expected age-related decline in PF. OBJECTIVE:To describe longitudinal changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) based on a fixed (12.0 METs) and an age-adjusted standard and compare the prevalence of fit/unfit firefighters (FFs) over eight years. METHODS:297 Brazilian male firefighters were randomly selected. CRF was assessed by the 12-minute Cooper test. To compare the prevalence’s of fit/unfit FFs depending on the standard (12 METs vs. age-adjusted), the McNemar test was used. RESULTS:The reduction in the prevalence of fit firefighters was 4.4-fold higher when the analysis did not consider age. CONCLUSION:After eight years, the prevalence of fit FFs decreased by 30.5% based on the fixed standard, while this reduction was only 7% when using an age-adjusted standard.
Keywords: Occupational health, aging, body mass index
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-220608
Journal: Work, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 821-829, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]