Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Special Section: Developing Ergonomic Practices: From Companies to Territories
Guest editors: Pascal Béguin and Marianne Cerf
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Cerf, Mariannea; * | Le Bail, Chloéb | Boccara, Vincentb | Loyce, Chantalc
Affiliations: [a] INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR SAD-APT, Université Paris-Saclay, 91120, Palaiseau, France | [b] CNRS, LISN, 91405, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay,France | [c] AgroParisTech, INRAE, UMR Agronomie, 91120, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Marianne Cerf, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR SAD-APT, Université Paris-Saclay, 91120, Palaiseau, France. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Few ergonomics studies have explored the work required to implement territorialized public policies. OBJECTIVE:To identify key challenges for ergonomists who analyse and support intermediation work taking place in the design and implementation of a Territorial Food Project or TFP (a public policy device). METHODS:We adapted a framework developed in the field of political sociology. The analysis focuses on two scales to identify key characteristics of intermediation work: the agri-urban area as delimited and targeted by the TFP; and the farm and its relationships to food systems. To capture how intermediation work articulates prescription and action, we studied first the work carried out by the actors to use a public policy device such as TFP, and second the evolving farming work systems’ connections to food systems and how they are supported by various actors. RESULTS:Intermediation work is spread across a wide diversity of actors. Coordination at governance level aims to allocate resources among institutional actors and to check the progress of the elaborated action plan. Coordination at operational level, which is meant to support farming work system dynamics or to implement the action plan, focuses on fostering the emergence of initiatives but seems to lack a shared vision and time availability. CONCLUSION:We identify two main challenges: to further develop a framework for analysing the intermediation work occurring in a multi-scale and territorial perspective; and to develop new intervention methods so that ergonomists can take part in and support such intermediation work.
Keywords: Food policy, local food systems, facilitation, peri-urban agriculture, ergonomic intervention
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-220298
Journal: Work, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 343-357, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]