Affiliations: [a]
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA
| [b]
Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA
Correspondence:
[*]
Address for correspondence: Michelle M. Robertson, Ph.D., CPE, 71 Frankland Rd., Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA. Tel.: +1 508 497 0248; Fax: +1 508 435 8136; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Sedentary work is associated with many adverse health outcomes, and sit-stand workstations in offices have emerged as a way to counteract sedentary work. OBJECTIVE:This paper reviews the existing knowledge on sit-stand workstations, treadmill workstations and bicycle workstations. METHODS:The inclusion/exclusion criteria were: 1) empirical research examining the effectiveness of sit-stand workstations in lab or field studies, 2) working adult population, 3) sit-stand workstation interventions where workers performed the same task from a seated or standing position, 4) outcomes measures of discomfort (comfort), performance, sit-stand behaviors, user satisfaction, kinematic and physiological measures. Search terms were: sit-stand, treadmill, bicycle, workstations, sedentary behavior, office ergonomics, and comfort. RESULTS:Many studies considered productivity, comfort and physiological measures as important outcomes to assess the efficacy of sit-stand workstations and the experimental design was variable. Preliminary data suggests that some amount of standing during an 8-hour workday could be beneficial without compromising user comfort or productivity; however, there is very little data on the efficacy of treadmill and bicycle workstations. CONCLUSIONS:Based on these preliminary data from 26 studies, conducting large scale randomized controlled trials with ergonomic training as their essential component is recommended to understand the benefits of sit-stand workstations for prevention of sedentary work.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal symptoms, ergonomics training, productivity, comfort and health
