Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Nivon, Charlottea | Fontana, Lucb; c | Trombert-Paviot, Béatriced | Bally, Jean Noela | Pelissier, Caroleb; c; *
Affiliations: [a] Département de Médecine Générale, Faculté de Médecine Jacques Lisfranc, Saint Priest-en-Jarez, France | [b] Université Lyon 1, UMRESTTE UMR T9405, Lyon, France | [c] Service de Santé au Travail Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France | [d] Service de Santé Publique et de l’Information Médicale (SSPIM), Saint Jean de Bonnefonds, CHU de Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Dr. Carole Pelissier, Department of Occupational Health, Saint-Etienne University Hospital Center, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Mental distress at work is a complex multifactorial phenomenon liable to impact health and personal life. OBJECTIVE:To assess the proportion of general practice consultations for mental distress at work and determine how general practitioners (GPs) manage these patients and the factors leading to consultation. METHODS:The frequency of consultations for mental distress at work was assessed on a self-administered questionnaire sent to the general practitioners (GPs) of the Loire administrative Département (France). Information on factors leading to consultation on management was obtained by a self-administered questionnaire in a sample of GPs and patients. RESULTS:Twenty-two patients were included by 16 GPs. 27% of patients were referred to an occupational physician. The frequency of consultations for mental distress at work was about 2%. Patients may wait several weeks or months before consulting, although a majority reported an impact on family life and health. A triggering event was often present, but no work accident procedure was undertaken. CONCLUSION:This study highlights the importance of better identifying adverse experience of working conditions and impaired mental health and reporting this to an occupational physician who can undertake preventive measures. Communication between occupational physician, employee and GP needs to be improved.
Keywords: Medical consultations, psychosocial risk factors, work-related common mental disorders
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-213633
Journal: Work, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 343-350, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]