Workplace inclusion: A scoping review of the qualitative literature

Article type: Review Article

Authors: Rezai, Mana^{a; *} | Lindsay, Sally^{a; b; 1} | Ahmed, Hiba^{a; 2} | Vijayakumar, Abirami^{a; b; 3}

Affiliations: [a] Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada | [b] Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Mana Rezai, Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5998-9760.

Note: [1] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5903-290X

Note: [2] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4555-6208

Note: [3] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3679-1564

Abstract: BACKGROUND:An inclusive workplace culture supports and values the individual and collective work processes of workers from diverse backgrounds. The reality or perception of inclusion or exclusion at work can influence the social functioning, health, and well-being of workers. However, we lack knowledge about the concepts relevant to inclusion at the workplace. Furthermore, research is needed to better understand the drivers and obstacles to workplace inclusion to better promote participation in working life. OBJECTIVE:This scoping review of the qualitative literature identifies the barriers to and facilitators of workplace inclusion. METHODS:Systematic searches of five databases were conducted from 2000 to January 2020. Pairs of reviewers independently screened and reviewed all citations and full-text articles. We used Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework which advances through five stages. Barriers and facilitators of workplace inclusion were categorized relative to a multi-layered conceptualization of workplace inclusion and grouped by theme. Studies were described and thematic results totaled and communicated with evidence tables and conceptual maps. RESULTS:Thirty-nine qualitative studies met our inclusion criteria. All five domains of the multi-layered framework were represented by the reported shared experiences of study participants. Organizational level factors, especially attitudinal barriers were the most reported barriers to workplace inclusion. Facilitators of workplace inclusion focused on employer level factors and most often cited the role of inclusive leadership and support. CONCLUSION:Workplace inclusion requires consideration of societal, organizational, employer, and interpersonal level factors in addition to individual worker characteristics.

Keywords: Work, employment, social participation, scoping review

DOI: 10.3233/WOR-211343

Journal: Work, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 59-73, 2023