Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Coutinho, Hugoa | Queirós, Cristinaa | Henriques, Anab | Norton, Pedrob; c | Alves, Elisabeteb; d; *
Affiliations: [a] Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal | [b] EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Portugal | [c] Department of Occupational Health, São João Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal | [d] Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Elisabete Alves, ORCID Number: 0000-0002-7738-0887, Instituto de Saúde Pública – Universidade do Porto (ISPUP); Rua das Taipas n 135; 4050-600 Porto, Portugal. Tel.: +351 222 061 820; Fax: +351 222 061 821; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Understanding which factors influence occupational safety and health risks is crucial to promote psychosocial risk management. OBJECTIVE:To assess the main work-related determinants of high exposure to psychosocial risk factors among Portuguese employees in the hospital setting. METHODS:Between May and July 2014, 399 employees of a public hospital completed a structured questionnaire. Psychosocial factors were assessed by the Portuguese medium length version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Age and gender adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed by logistic regression models. RESULTS:The highest psychosocial risks emerged in the p ersonality (53.8%), workplace demands (28.1%), and social relationships and leadership (24.4%) categories. Professionals with non-health care roles presented a higher risk in the worker-work interface (OR = 2.60;95% CI:1.02–6.62), that evaluated work insecurity, satisfaction and the work-family interface. Shift workers were exposed to a higher psychosocial risk in workplace demands (OR = 1.79;95% CI:1.10–2.91), personality (OR = 2.45;95% CI:1.36–4.41), and health and well-being (OR = 3.18; 95% CI:1.72–5.66). Non-government employees had a higher risk exposure in personality (OR = 2.20;95% CI:1.15–4.21), and those who were absent from work in personality (OR = 2.62;95% CI:1.41–4.86), and health and wellbeing (OR = 2.34;95% CI:1.27–4.31). CONCLUSIONS:Employees working in the hospital setting are vulnerable to psychosocial risk factors. Identifying those risks contributes to optimize workers' psychosocial health, increasing the effectiveness of the organization.
Keywords: Occupational health, risk assessment, public, hospital workers
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-182825
Journal: Work, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 551-560, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]