Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Løvseth, Lise Tevik; | Aasland, Olaf Gjerløw; | Fridner, Ann; | Schenck-Gustafsson, Karin; | Jónsdóttir, Lilja Sigrun | Einarsdóttir, Torgerdur | Marini, Massimo | Minucci, Daria | Pavan, Luigi | Götestam, K Gunnar; | Linaker, Olav Morten;
Affiliations: Department of Research and Development, Division of Psychiatry [AFFU], St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway | Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway | The Research Institute of the Norwegian Medical Association, Oslo, Norway | Institute of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Norwayy | Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm Sweden | Center for Gender Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden | Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Swedenn | The Directorate of Health, Seltjarnarnes, Iceland | Faculty of Social Science, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland | Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Science, Clinic of Psychiatry, University of Padova, Padua, Italy | Department of Oncological Gynecology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy | Department of Psychiatrics, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
Note: [] Corresponding author: Lise Tevik Løvseth, Department of Research and Development, Division of Psychiatry (AFFU), St Olavs University Hospital, PO Box 3008 Lade, NO-7041 Trondheim, Norway. Tel.: +47 72 82 30 30; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Concerns about protecting patient's privacy can interfere with proper stress adaptation which isassociated with physician's health. It is important to investigate relevant organizational confounders to this phenomenon to enable interventions that can ameliorate the subjective burden of patient confidentiality. OBJECTIVES: This study investigatesfactors in the psychosocial work environment that can explain patient confidentiality's prominence in social support seeking among physicians, and if these factors covary differently with support seeking according to country. PARTICIPANTS: University hospital physicians in four European cities (N=2095) in Sweden, Norway, Iceland and Italy participated in a cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Questionnaire comprised items on psychosocial work environment, basic socio-demographics, presence of formal and informal meetings at work, and measurement of confidentiality as a barrier for support. RESULTS: High role conflict, availability of formal or informal meetings, lack of control over decisions, and lack of control over work pace were predictors of confidentiality as a barrier to support. There were differences between countries in how these factors covaried with confidentiality as a barrier to support. High role conflict was the strongest predictor of confidentiality as a barrier to support across all samples. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial work factors predicted confidentiality as a barrier to support seeking among physicians. It is important to create routines and an organizational framework that ensures both the patient's right to privacy and physician's ability to cope with emotional demanding situations from work.
Keywords: Professional secrecy, doctor, social support, work environment, role conflict
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-131725
Journal: Work, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 113-121, 2014
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]