Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Ergonomic Products
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Lenker, James A. | Nasarwanji, Mahiyar | Paquet, Victor | Feathers, David
Affiliations: Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Public Health & Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA | Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA | Department of Design and Environmental Access, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Jim Lenker, 515 Kimball Tower, 3435 Main Street, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. Tel.: +1 716 829 6726; Fax: +1 716 829 3217; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Background: While there are many available tools and methods to evaluate product usability, few have been tested on user groups with disabilities and even fewer systematically consider universal design principles. Objective: This paper describes the development and preliminary psychometric testing of the Rapid Assessment of Product Usability & Universal Design (RAPUUD), a 12-item user-report tool based on the seven principles of universal design. Method: A preliminary set of items was created to elicit ratings of diverse product characteristics (e.g., physical effort, cognitive effort, assistance required, safety). Data were gathered from 61 participants who rated the usability of products they use in their own environments. Results: Each item elicited a full range of responses, with no apparent floor or ceiling effects. Collectively, the 12 items achieved a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.80). The data indicate that the tool was sensitive to differences in functional abilities, as well as differences in product characteristics. The instrument was usable for a range of consumer products, though not all items were appropriate for each and every product. Conclusion: The results suggest that the instrument could become a pragmatic tool for designers to identify usability problems experienced by a diversity of user populations.
Keywords: Universal design, usability, consumer products, measurement, special populations, disability
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1160
Journal: Work, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 141-150, 2011
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]