Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Shaw, Lynn | McDermid, Joy | Kothari, Anita | Lindsay, Rob | Brake, Phil | Page, Peter | Argyle, Colin | Gagnon, Crystal | Knott, Melissa
Affiliations: The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada | McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada | Canadian Injured Workers Alliance, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada | Ontario Network of Injured Worker Groups, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada | Ontario Federation of Labour, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Dr. Lynn Shaw, The University of Western Ontario, School of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Elborn College, 1201 Western Rd., London, Ontario, N6G 1H1, Canada. Tel.: +1 519 661 2111 x.88971; Fax: +1 519 661 3894; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study is to understand the barriers and facilitators in brokering knowledge brokering knowledge to help injured workers make informed decisions about recovery and to support their transitions to return to work (RTW). Participants: Perceptions of 63 Injured Worker Groups (IWGs) and 43 Health Care Professionals (HCPs) in facilitating and brokering knowledge were examined. Methods: Critical theory and participatory action research approaches informed the development of a multi-stakeholder research team and the study design to support an exploration into knowledge exchange and transfer. Data was analyzed using a critical occupational perspective to reveal the source of barriers and to identify the facilitators of the knowledge exchange and transfer process. Results: Barriers in transferring knowledge included system barriers, a lack of information accessibility, and problems with variations in injured worker capacity and experience using information. IWG and HCP participants lacked expertise in knowledge transfer. Findings also revealed the interactive knowledge transfer processes that IWGs and HCPs use to help injured workers understand and use information. Conclusions: Change is required to improve knowledge exchange and transfer of information for and to persons with injuries and disabilities. Suggested changes include the development of a sustainable knowledge transfer community of practice, a best practice guide for knowledge brokers such as IWGs and HCPs, and a process for ongoing assessment and evaluation of injured worker information needs and preferences.
Keywords: Knowledge transfer, knowledge brokering, injured workers, consumer groups, health care professionals, return to work transitions
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1010
Journal: Work, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 89-101, 2010
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]