Affiliations: [a]
Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| [b]
Department of Adult Psychiatry, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France
| [c]
Department of Psychology, Catholic University Milan, Italy
| [d]
Milan Center for Neuroscience (Neuromi)
| [e]
University Research Center in Opticsand Optometry, Università di Milano-Bicocca (Comib), Milano, Italy
| [f]
Neuroscience Department “Fondazione Poliambulanza” Hospital, Brescia, Italy
Abstract: Background:Agnosia for objects is often overlooked in neuropsychology, especially with respect to rehabilitation. Prosopagnosia has been studied more extensively, yet there have been few attempts at training it. The lack of training protocols may partially be accounted for by their relatively low incidence and specificity to sensory modality. However, finding effective rehabilitations for such deficits may help to reduce their impact on the social and psychological functioning of individuals. Objective:Our aim in this study was to provide clinicians and researchers with useful information with which to conduct new studies on the rehabilitation of object agnosia and prosopagnosia. To accomplish this, we performed a systematic and comprehensive review of the effect of neuropsychological rehabilitation on visual object and prosopagnosia. Methods:The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. In addition, the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) scales were used to assess the quality of reporting. Results:Seven articles regarding object agnosia, eight articles describing treatments for prosopagnosia, and two articles describing treatments for both deficits were included. Conclusions:In the light of the studies reviewed, treatments based on analysis of parts seem effective for object agnosia, while prosopagnosia appears to benefit most from treatments relying on holistic/configural processing. However, more attempts at rehabilitation of face and object agnosia are needed to clarify the mechanisms of these processes and possible rehabilitations. Moreover, a publication bias could mask a broader attempt to find effective treatments for visual agnosia and leaving out studies that are potentially more informative.
