Affiliations: Department of Anatomy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (Sweden)
Note: [] Correspondence: H. Aldskogius, Department of Anatomy, Karolinska Institutet, Box 60400, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract: There are indications that specific factors are present in the distal stump of transected nerves which preferentially attract axons of the corresponding proximal stump into the distal nerve stumps. However, the impact of these factors is unclear, since there is abundant evidence that numerous regenerating motor and sensory axons are topographically misdirected after nerve transection and repair. Topographic reinnervation is improved after fascicular repair of fasciculated nerves, and quite precise after nerve crush. The latter may not be true, however, for non-myelinated axons, which show a high degree of aberrant growth even after crush. In contrast, regenerative outgrowth appears to be topographically specific after neonatal nerve transection. Reinnervation of muscle fibers appears to be unspecific in adult mammals, but specific after neonatal injury under certain circumstances. Some preference for reinnervation of the appropriate sensory receptors seems to exist although this preference does not preclude reinnervation of receptors by ‘foreign’ sensory fibers. In conclusion, incorrect topographic and target reinnervation commonly occurs after peripheral regeneration in adult mammals, and most certainly explains some of the functional disturbances after peripheral nerve lesions. Topographic regeneration appears to be better after nerve injury in developing mammals indicating that mechanisms from the developmental period may persist and aid in accurate regenerative outgrowth.
