Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Hesse, S. | Werner, C. | Schonhardt, E.M. | Bardeleben, A. | Jenrich, W. | Kirker, S.G.B.
Affiliations: Klinik Berlin, Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Germany | Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Potsdam, Germany | Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
Note: [] Corresponding author: Stefan Hesse, MD, Klinik Berlin, Kladower Damm 223, 14089 Berlin, Germany. Tel.: +49 30 36503 105; Fax: -123; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Background and Purpose: Preliminary reports suggest that central stimulation may enhance the effect of conventional physical therapies after stroke. This pilot study examines the safety and methodology of using transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) with robot-assisted arm training (AT), to inform planning a larger randomised controlled trial. Subjects: Ten patients, after an ischaemic stroke 4–8 weeks before study onset, no history of epilepsy, participated. Eight had a cortical lesion and 2 had subcortical lesions: all had severe arm paresis and, co-incidentally, 5 had severe aphasia. Methods: Over six weeks, they received thirty 20 min-sessions of AT. During the first 7 minutes, 1.5mA of tDCS was applied, with the anode over the lesioned hemisphere and the cathode above the contralateral orbit. Arm and language impairment were assessed with the Fugl-Meyer motor score (FM, full range 0–66) and the Aachener Aphasie Test. Results: No major side effects occurred. Arm function of three patients (two with a subcortical lesion) improved significantly, with FM scores increasing from 6 to 28, 10 to 49 and 11 to 48. In the remaining seven patients, all with cortical lesions, arm function changed little, FM scores did not increase more than 5 points. Unexpectedly, aphasia improved in 4 patients. Conclusions: These procedures are safe, and easy to use in a clinical setting. In future studies, patients should be stratified by degree of arm weakness and lesion site, also the unexpected aphasia improvement warrants following-up.
Keywords: Stroke, rehabilitation, aphasia, plasticity, brain stimulation, recovery of function
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 9-15, 2007
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]