Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Merlo, A.a; b; * | Longhi, M.a | Giannotti, E.a | Prati, P.a | Giacobbi, M.a | Ruscelli, E.a | Mancini, A.a | Ottaviani, M.a | Montanari, L.a | Mazzoli, D.a
Affiliations: [a] Gait & Motion Analysis Laboratory, Sol et Salus Hospital, Rimini, Italy | [b] Motion Analysis Laboratory, AUSL of Reggio Emilia, Correggio, Reggio Emilia, Italy
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Andrea Merlo, Motion Analysis Laboratory – Department of Rehabilitation, AUSL Reggio Emilia, San Sebastiano Hospital, via Mandriolo Superiore, 11 - 42015 Correggio, Reggio Emilia, Italy. Tel.: +39 0522 630 391; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Background:Robotic rehabilitation devices for upper limb function (ULF) provide global indicators of a patient's ability, but the temporal evolution of motion related to motor control is disregarded. Objective:To determine normative values for indices of accuracy, speed and smoothness in the evaluation of upper limb function. Methods:Twenty-five healthy individuals performed the Armeo®Spring device “Vertical Capture” task. Custom stand-alone software was developed to provide the following indices: global Hand Path Ratio (HPR), local HPR in the target area (locHPR), vertical and horizontal overshoot (vertOS, horOS), maximum and mean velocity (maxVel, meanVel), mean/maximum velocity, number of peaks in velocity profiles (NVelPeaks) and normalized jerk (NormJerk). The dependence of indices on task characteristics was analyzed by an ANCOVA test. Indices inner relationships were assessed by a correlation and a factor analysis. Normative values were then provided. Results:4,268 single reaching movements were analyzed. Four indices were not affected by movement direction. Indices were minimally influenced by the difficulty level. Based upon correlation and factor analysis indices and can be grouped into three assessment fields, dealing with precision, velocity and smoothness. Conclusions:We have developed a tool to assess ULF in dynamic condition. Normative values were obtained to be used as references in assessing patients.
Keywords: Upper limb, robotic device, robotic rehabilitation, normative values, Armeo®Spring
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-130998
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 523-530, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]