Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Review Article
Authors: Ito, Daisukea; b | Kawakami, Michiyukia; b; * | Kuwahara, Watarua | Yamada, Yukaa | Kondo, Kunitsugub | Tsuji, Tetsuyaa
Affiliations: [a] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan | [b] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Michiyuki Kawakami, MD, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Electrical stimulation (ES) of the shoulder is effective in treating subluxation and shoulder pain. However, few studies have reported on ES of the hemiplegic shoulder with motor function as an outcome; thus, the method remains unclear. OBJECTIVE:We aimed to map the existing evidence and identify the parameters for ES of the hemiplegic shoulder for motor function in stroke patients. METHODS:A literature search was performed through PubMed and Scopus to retrieve original articles from 1975 to March 2023 using the terms “stroke”, “shoulder”, and “electricity”. We selected studies in which ES was performed on hemiplegic shoulders after stroke, parameters were described, and upper extremity motor functional assessment was included as an outcome. The extracted data included study design, phase, sample size, electrode position, parameters, intervention period, evaluation frequency, outcomes, and results. RESULTS:Of the 449 titles identified, 25 fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Nineteen were randomized controlled trials. The most common electrode positions and parameters (frequency and pulse width) were over the posterior deltoid and the supraspinatus (upper trapezius) muscles, 30 Hz, and 250μs, respectively. The intervention period was 30–60 minutes per day, 5–7 days per week, for 4–5 weeks in over half of the studies. CONCLUSION:Stimulation positions and parameters for electrical stimulation of the hemiplegic shoulder are inconsistent. Whether ES represents a significant treatment option remains unclear. Establishing universal ES methods is necessary to improve the motor function of hemiplegic shoulders.
Keywords: Stroke, shoulder, electricity, rehabilitation, review
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-220301
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 19-32, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]