Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Thematic Issue: Setting a Research Agenda for Caregiving after Neurotrauma and Neurological Disability
Guest editors: Paul B. Perrin
Article type: Review Article
Authors: Hines, Emily A.a; * | Farr, Ellen M.a | Rhudy, Lori M.b | Chesak, Sherry S.c | Kinzelman Vesely, Elissa A.d | Esterov, Dmitrye
Affiliations: [a] Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA | [b] Department of Graduate Nursing, Winona State University, Rochester, MN, USA | [c] Department of Nursing, Division of Nursing Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA | [d] Mayo Medical Library, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA | [e] Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Emily Hines, Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Acquired brain injury (BI) is associated with negative mental health outcomes for both people with BI, their caregivers (CG), and patient-CG dyads, which may be mitigated through increased resilience. However, little is known regarding the efficacy of resilience interventions focused on CGs of individuals with BI, as well as dyads, which may be instrumental for positive outcomes. OBJECTIVE:To systematically review the evidence of the efficacy of resilience interventions focused on CGs and/or dyads of individuals with BI. METHODS:A search of MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL with Full Text, Scopus, SCIE, and ESCI was conducted. Each title and abstract were screened by two authors independently. Each full text review, study data extraction, and study quality assessment was performed independently by two authors. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. RESULTS:Out of 11,959 articles retrieved, 347 full text articles were assessed for review and 18 met inclusion criteria for data extraction and quality assessment. Resilience interventions were stratified into 5 different categories based on the type of intervention. CONCLUSION:This systematic review suggests that dyadic/CG resilience interventions may improve mental health related outcomes, but conclusions were limited secondary to heterogenous outcomes and lack of a standardized resiliency construct. Future efforts are compulsory to create a standardized resiliency construct and associated outcomes focused on persons with BI, their CGs, and dyads.
Keywords: Brain injury, traumatic brain injury, acquired brain injury, dyad, caregiver, resiliency, resilience
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-220125
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 29-46, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]