Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Review Article
Authors: Zhang, Qinga; b; 1 | Fu, Chenyingb; c; 1 | Liang, Zejuna; b | Peng, Lihonga; b | Xiong, Fenga; b | Chen, Lia; b | He, Chengqia; b | Wei, Quana; b; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China | [b] Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan, China | [c] State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Dr. Quan Wei, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. E-mail: [email protected].
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:The effectiveness of trunk restraint on post-stroke arm motor function and daily function remain controversial. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effect of adding trunk restraint to task-oriented rehabilitation of arm motor function and functional ability after stroke. METHODS:Nine databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials studying the effects of trunk restraint in post-stroke task-oriented training. Researchers assessed methodological qualities using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale, and extracted data related to study participants, intervention, and outcomes. The overall effectiveness was calculated using a meta-analytic method. RESULTS:In total, ten articles met the inclusion criteria and nine trails (n = 255 subjects) were included in quantitative analyses. Meta-analysis revealed that trunk restraint exhibited a significant improvement on the Motor Activity Log-amount of use, 0.39 (95% CI: 0.25– 0.54), the Motor Activity Log-quality of movement, 0.45 (95% CI: 0.27– 0.63), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (upper extremity), 1.09 (95% CI: 0.67– 1.51), Action Research Arm test, 4.51 (95% CI: 2.49– 6.54) and performance of Activities of daily living, 1.70 (95% CI: 0.19– 3.21) in trunk restraint group in patients at subacute stage, compared to the non-trunk restraint group, but no significant difference was found in patients with chronic stroke. CONCLUSIONS:Adding trunk restraint to task-oriented training may improve function in patients with subacute stroke.
Keywords: Stroke, trunk restraint, task-oriented training, upper extremity, functional performance
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-192964
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 95-108, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]