Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Brown, Jessicaa; * | Hux, Karenb | Hey, Morganb | Murphy, Madelinea
Affiliations: [a] Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA | [b] Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Jessica A. Brown, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, Assistant Professor, 164 Pillsbury Drive S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Tel.: +1 612 626 9688; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: PURPOSE:Many college students with TBI rely on external strategies and supports to compensate for persistent memory, organization, and planning deficits that interfere with recalling and executing daily tasks. Practitioners know little, however, about the supports students with TBI choose for this purpose, the reasoning behind their choice, or preferred features of selected supports. The purpose of this study was to explore these issues. METHOD:We collected and analyzed quantitative and qualitative data from eight college students with TBI for completion of a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods design. Data analysis included evaluation and triangulation of participant demographic information, survey responses about persistent post-injury symptoms, transcripts from semi-structured interviews about cognitive support devices and strategies, and ranking results about specific compensatory tools. RESULTS:Results suggest that college students with TBI prefer high-tech external supports—sometimes with the addition of low-tech, paper supports—to assist them in managing daily tasks. This preference related to features of portability, accessibility, and automatic reminders. An electronic calendar was the most-preferred high-tech support, and a paper checklist was the most-preferred low-tech support. CONCLUSIONS:Rehabilitation professionals should consider implementing high-tech supports with preferred characteristics during treatment given the preferences of students with TBI and the consequent likelihood of their continued long-term use following reintegration to community settings.
Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, student survivors, cognitive deficits, external supports
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-162065
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 483-499, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]