Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: The Assessment of Symptom and Performance Validity in Neurorehabilitation
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Zasler, Nathan D.a; b; c; d; e; f; *
Affiliations: [a] Concussion Care Centre of Virginia, Ltd, Richmond, VA, USA | [b] Tree of Life Services, Inc, Richmond, VA, USA | [c] VCU Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Richmond, VA, USA | [d] Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA | [e] University of Virginia Brain Injury and Sports Concussion Institute, Charlottesville, VA, USA | [f] Distinguished Clinical Professor of Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Touro College, NY, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Nathan D. Zasler, MD, Concussion Care Centre of Virginia, Ltd., 3721 Westerre Parkway, Suite B, Richmond, VA 23233, USA. Tel.: +1 804 346 1803; Fax: +1 804 346 1956; [email protected]
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The assessment of any patient or examinee with neurological impairment, whether acquired or congenital, provides a key set of data points in the context of developing accurate diagnostic impressions and implementing an appropriate neurorehabilitation program. As part of that assessment, the neurological physical exam is an extremely important component of the overall neurological assessment. PURPOSE: In the aforementioned context, clinicians often are confounded by unusual, atypical or unexplainable physical exam findings that bring into question the organicity, veracity, and/or underlying cause of the observed clinical presentation. The purpose of this review is to provide readers with general directions and specific caveats regarding validity assessment in the context of the neurological physical exam. CONCLUSIONS: It is of utmost importance for health care practitioners to be aware of assessment methodologies that may assist in determining the validity of the neurological physical exam and differentiating organic from non-organic/functional impairments. Maybe more importantly, the limitations of many commonly used strategies for assessment of non-organicity should be recognized and consider prior to labeling observed physical findings on neurological exam as non-organic or functional.
Keywords: Neurological exam, validity assessment, effort, functional neurologic disorder, malingering, symptom exaggeration
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-151229
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 401-413, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]