Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Gall, Carolin; * | Günther, Tobias | Fuhrmans, Franziska | Sabel, Bernhard A.
Affiliations: Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Medical Faculty, Institute of Medical Psychology, Magdeburg, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Carolin Gall, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Medical Faculty, Institute of Medical Psychology, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany. Tel.: +49 391 6721 807; Fax: +49 391 6721 803; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Introduction:With neuropsychological rehabilitation approaches neglect patients can learn to compensate for the reduced awareness of the contralesional hemispace that is often observed after right brain damage. Here, we report contralesional “cross-over” deviations in line bisection that are hypothesized to be a result of focusing on the contralesional hemispace while the intact hemispace is “neglected”. We investigate whether this unexpected pattern of deviation is related to defects in the visual field, motor intention/hypokinesia deficits or deficits in working memory. Methods:Neglect patients with and without homonymous field defects were screened for contralesional cross-over deviations in line bisection of long lines. During line bisection eye movements were recorded in two conditions with and without requiring hand movements in order to search for directional hypokinesia. Visual fields were tested with near-threshold perimetry and with supra-threshold campimetry. Results:Of 53 chronic neglect patients only 8 showed cross-over in line bisection. Evidence for directional hypokinesia was found in only one patient. Patients with cross-over focused more often to the left than to the right of the objective line midpoint. Patients with and without visual field defects did not differ in the extent of cross-over deviations. Cross-over deviation and inconsistent stimulus detection in left hemispace were correlated irrespective of the presence of a visual field deficit. Larger cross-over deviations were associated with poorer verbal working memory span, and disorganized patterns of eye movement were related to reduced visuo-spatial working memory capacity. Conclusion:Increasing awareness of the disorder and the use of compensatory strategies may have led to a cross-over shift of visual search dominance towards the neglected side resulting in an exploration deficit of the ipsilesional side.
Keywords: Neuroophthalmology, hemispatial neglect, line bisection, eye movements, visual field defects
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-2012-0787
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 171-184, 2012
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]