Affiliations: [a] Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA | [b] Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA | [c] Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Patrick Sparto, PhD, PT, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Physical Therapy, 6035 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. Tel.: 412 383 6729; Fax: 412 383 6629; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Background:The purpose of this study was to examine how older adults with vestibular impairment use sensory feedback for postural control. Methods:Nine older adult subjects with unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH, mean age 69 y) and 14 older (mean age 70 y) and 8 young adult controls (CON, mean age 28 y) viewed full-field optic flow scenes while standing on a fixed or sway-referenced support surface. The subjects with UVH had 100% caloric asymmetry. Optic flow consisted of sinusoidal anterior-posterior movement of the visual surround at three frequencies and three amplitudes of stimulation. The anterior-posterior head sway was measured. The number of head sway responses that were coupled to the optic flow and magnitude of head sway during optic flow relative to during quiet stance on fixed floor was quantified. Results:The number of trials in which the head sway response was significantly coupled to the optic flow was significantly greater in the Older UVH and Older CON subjects compared with the Young CON subjects. Furthermore, the magnitude of head sway was two to three times greater in Older UVH and CON compared with Young CON subjects. There was no difference in coupling or magnitude of head sway between Older UVH and Older CON subjects. The amplitude of sway was also dependent on the amount of surface support, stimulus frequency, and stimulus amplitude. Conclusions:Older adults with unilateral vestibular hypofunction who are able to effectively compensate show no difference in postural responses elicited by optic flow compared with age-matched controls.
