Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Crane, Benjamin T. | Tian, Junru | Demer, Joseph L.;
Affiliations: Departments of Ophthalmology and Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095-7002, USA
Note: [*] Correspondence to: Joseph L. Demer, M.D., Ph.D., Jules Stein Eye Institute, 100 Stein Plaza, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7002, USA. Tel.: +1 310 825 5931; Fax: +1 310 206 7826; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: To investigate the effect of asymmetrical vestibular input on the perceived straight-ahead direction, we compared 7 subjects (age 59±8 yrs, mean ± SD) who had chronic (>10 mos) unilateral vestibular deafferentation with 10 age matched controls (age 61±6 younger controls (age 28±7 yrs). Despite the age difference, the two control groups performed similarly and were therefore pooled. Eye and head movements were recorded using search coils as subjects underwent 30 s trials of sinusoidal, whole body oscillation (0.4–2 Hz, peak velocities 0–120∘/s) in darkness while attempting to maintain gaze on a remembered target 5 m distant. As a control, most stimulus oscillations were randomly superimposed on an imperceptible, constant velocity of ±0.5∘/s that produced a whole-body offest of 15∘ by the end of the trial. Following oscillation, subjects remained motionless in darkness and were asked to orient both gaze and a manipulandum to the remembered target location. In control subjects, mean final gaze and manipulandum positions were within 15∘ of the target for all testing conditions. There was no dependence of final gaze and manipulandum positions on the frequency or velocity of the preceding whole-body oscillations (p>0.05). In four of seven unilaterally deafferented subjects there was an ipsilesional bias of final eye position of ⩾10∘. These subjects moved both eye and manipulandum to the ipsilesional side, with the error increasing at higher stimulus velocities. For the 120∘/s peak head velocity, mean ipsilesional gaze bias ranged from 10–37∘ and mean manipulandum bias ranged from 26–108∘. Although the errors depended on velocity p<0.01), errors were independent of frequency (p>0.1). In the remaining three subjects with vestibular deafferentation, final gaze and manipulandum positions were not statistically different from controls. Early gain (eye velocity / head velocity) of the VOR averaged 0.82±0.01 for the first 10 s of all trials and was similar in all groups (p>0.1). Gain during the final 10 s gain averaged 0.78±0.01 for control subjects, but was significantly lower at 0.70±0.01 for unilaterally deafferented subjects, whose eye positions reached the limit of the ocular motor range. We conclude that many humans with chronic unilateral vestibular deafferentation have a large ipsilesional dynamic bias of eye position and the perceived straight ahead direction reflecting persistent asymmetry of vestibular processing.
Keywords: Ewald's second law, target cues, yaw oscillation
DOI: 10.3233/VES-2000-10603
Journal: Journal of Vestibular Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 259-269, 2000
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]