Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Kim, Minheea | Kim, Yushina | Oh, Sejuna | Suh, Dongwonb | Eun, Seon-Deckc | Yoon, BumChula; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, Korea | [b] Barunsesang Hospital, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea | [c] Korea National Rehabilitation Research Institute, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: BumChul Yoon, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Korea University Jeongneung 3-Dong, Sungbuk-Gu, Seoul 136-703, Korea. Tel.: +82 29402833; Fax: +82 29402830; E-mail:[email protected]
Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Application of hollowing and bracing, abdominal activation strategies (AAS), has focused on improving trunk stability. This study aimed to clarify the AAS effect on body sway during support surface translation while standing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects (10 male, 10 female; aged 25.45 ± 3.22 years) performed hollowing, bracing, and natural strategies while standing, and exerted to maintain their balance during forward and backward translation. Ultrasonography evaluations confirmed the appropriate application of the 3 strategies by measuring abdominal muscle thickness. Additionally, a motion analysis system was used to capture the whole body sway along the sagittal plane. RESULTS: During backward translation, angular displacements of the trunk were significantly different among the 3 strategies (upper thoracic: F = 13.758, p < 0.001; lower thoracic: F = 8.477, p = 0.001; and lumbopelvis: F = 8.651, p = 0.001). AAS significantly decreased the sway by 25-36% in all inter-spinal segments compared with the natural strategy (p < 0.05). During forward translation, only angular displacement of the lower thoracic was significantly different among the 3 strategies (F = 7.640, p = 0.002), and bracing decreased the sway by 33.48% compared with the natural strategy (p = 0.003). No significant differences were seen between hollowing and bracing during forward and backward translation. CONCLUSIONS: AAS increased joint stability only in the trunk where joints are adjacent to abdominal muscles, but not in the lower extremities. The low impact of AAS on the lower extremities might have important implications on the paradigm of standing balance.
Keywords: Abdominal activation strategies, body sway, abdominal muscles, perturbation
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-150633
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 317-325, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]