Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Sobczak, Stéphanea; b; c; d; * | Dugailly, Pierre-Micheld | Gilbert, Kerry K.a | Hooper, Troy L.a | Sizer, Jr., Phillip S.a | James, C. Rogera | Poortmans, Bernardc | Matthijs, Omer C.a | Brismée, Jean-Michela
Affiliations: [a] Clinical Anatomy Research Laboratory, Center for Rehabilitation Research, School of Allied Health Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA | [b] Département d'Anatomie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada | [c] Department of Physical Therapy, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium | [d] Research Unit in Osteopathy, Faculté des Sciences de la Motricité, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Stéphane Sobczak, Center for Rehabilitation Research, School of Allied Health Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA. Tel.: +1 806 743 3226; Fax: +1 806 743 6005; E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Stadiometry measures total trunk height variations but cannot quantify individual spinal segment height changes. Different methods exist to measure both intervertebral disc and lumbar spine height (LSH) variations but they are either limited by radiation exposure or cost. Musculoskeletal ultrasound could be a valuable alternative to measure spinal segmental height changes as a result of intervention. OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSU) and new anatomical landmark references used in assessing inter-mammillary distances (IMD) and LSH changes resulting from lumbar spine traction. METHODS: Two unembalmed cadaveric lumbar spines were extracted to assess (1) the reliability and validity of MSU, as compared to caliper, for measuring in vitro IMD and LSH using alternative anatomical landmarks than previously reported, and (2) the reliability of MSU for measuring in vitro IMD and lumbar spine height changes recorded during standardized mechanical traction up to 1.20 cm. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-rater reliability of musculoskeletal ultrasound for within and between sessions and for all experimental design, Standard Error ranged from 0.01 to 0.02 and from 0.03 to 0.04 cm for IMDs and LSHs, respectively. Root Mean Square Errors ranged from 1.6 to 6.8% and from 1 to 1.1% for IMDs and LSHs, respectively and mean ICC ranged from 0.98 to 1 for LSH. During traction, mean lumbar spine height measurement change using MSU was 1.15 ± 0.03 cm. Bland and Altman plots demonstrated confidence intervals included in the limits of agreement. Nevertheless, there were significant differences (p< 0.001) for both IMD measurements and lumbar spine height between caliper and ultrasound measurements. Musculoskeletal ultrasound overestimated distances of about 5.5 ± 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal ultrasound is reliable and accurate for measuring intersegmental spinal distances and lumbar spine height with an apparent slight overestimation of distances. Based on mean differences, ultrasound technology seems to be valid for measuring lumbar spine height changes and could be suitable for in vivo research.
Keywords: Lumbar spine, lumbar spine height, imaging, musculoskeletal ultrasound, spine, reliability, intervertebral disc
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-150613
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 171-182, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]