Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Johnson, Marit E.a; * | Karges-Brown, Joy R.b | Brismée, Jean-Michelc | Brenza, Timothy M.a; d | Piper, Adam K.a; e
Affiliations: [a] Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, USA | [b] Department of Physical Therapy, University of South Dakota, Sanford Coyote Sports Center, Vermillion, SD, USA | [c] Center for Rehabilitation Research, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA | [d] Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, USA | [e] Department of Industrial Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Marit E. Johnson, Biodynamics Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3820 S. Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Lumbar intervertebral disc height loss has been associated with spinal height change (SHC) and low back pain (LBP), including stenosis. Non-invasive methods to improve disc height loss require forms of lying down, which are unconducive to computer work. OBJECTIVE: Intermittent vertical traction (VT) integrated with seated computer work may provide ergonomic alternatives for increasing SHC to promote LBP relief. The primary aim was to develop and introduce a safe VT prototype and dosage to induce and measure SHC. Prototype comfort and LBP ratings were exploratory secondary aims. METHODS: Forty-one participants were stadiometry-measured for pre- and post-intervention SHC from seated VT at 35% body weight removed, supine lying (SL), and sitting at a computer (SIT) without VT. Pain ratings were recorded for those self-reporting LBP. VT prototype evaluations were compiled from a 3-question, 7-point Likert-style survey. RESULTS: SHC increased by 3.9 ± 3.4 mm in VT, 1.7 ± 3.4 mm in SIT, and 4.3 ± 3.1 mm in SL (P< 0.000). Post hoc findings were significant between VT and SIT (P< 0.000), and SL and SIT (P< 0.000). VT and SL LBP ratings both decreased, but not SIT. CONCLUSION: Intermittent seated VT is a promising alternative for postural relief during seated computer work, producing SHC similar to lying down without compromising workflow.
Keywords: Spine, low back pain, traction, sitting position, work
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-220202
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 739-749, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]